http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/17/health/california-girl-brain- dead/
Family wants to keep life support for girl brain dead after tonsil surgery
By Tom Watkins and Mayra Cuevas, CNN
updated 4:32 PM EST, Wed December 18, 2013
The mother of 13-year-old Jahi McMath, who was declared brain dead Thursday, three days after undergoing surgery to remove her tonsils, said Tuesday that the family should make the call.
... The surgery, which occurred December 9 [at Children's Hospital & Research Center in Oakland, California - ed.], initially appeared to have gone well, said Sandy Chatman, Jahi's grandmother who is herself a nurse and saw the girl in the recovery room. "She was alert and talking, and she was asking for a Popsicle because she said her throat hurt," Chatman said.
But Jahi was then moved to the intensive-care unit, and her relatives were denied access to the eighth-grader for 30 minutes; when they finally were allowed to see her, they knew something was wrong. "Upon entry, they saw that there was way too much blood," Chatman said.
"We kept asking, 'Is this normal?'" Sealey said. "Some nurses said, 'I don't know,' and some said, 'Yes.' There was a lot of uncertainty and a lack of urgency."
Sealey said that when Chatman noticed that her granddaughter's oxygen levels were dangerously low, she called for help.
But Jahi went into cardiac arrest. The medical staff performed chest compressions to revive her and gave her clotting medications, but nothing worked.
The girl's brain was severely injured by lack of oxygen. I am not commenting on the reported dispute regarding removing life support.
I am commenting on my concern about a possible contributory role of a new EHR.
At my Jan. 2, 2014 post "Doctors' Dissatisfaction With EHRs May Be Early Warning of Deeper Quality Problems" (http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2014/01/doctors-dissatisfaction-with-ehrs-may.html) I wrote of the distractions that physicians reported were caused by EHR systems such as:
... current EHR technology interferes with face-to-face discussions with patients; requires physicians to spend too much time performing clerical work; and degrades the accuracy of medical records by encouraging template-generated doctors' notes.
I had also noted nurse's concerns of "inevitable" patient injury due to EHR distractions, such as at:
- My July 12, 2013 post "RNs Say Sutter’s New Electronic System Causing Serious Disruptions to Safe Patient Care at East Bay Hospitals" (http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2013/07/rns-say-sutters-new-electronic-system.html),
- my May 30, 2013 post "Marin General Hospital's Nurses are Afraid a Defective EMR Implementation Will Harm or Kill Patients" at http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2013/05/marin-general-hospitals-nurses-are.html,
- my June 19, 2013 post "Affinity RNs Call for Halt to Flawed Electronic Medical Records System Scheduled to Go Live Friday" (http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2013/06/affinity-rns-call-for-halt-to-flawed.html),
- and at other posts citing similar nursing complaints.
The cases cited above involve the "EPIC" EHR, but similar issues arise will most of the current EHR sellers' products, which are unregulated.
For instance see the ECRI Institute's Deep Dive study of EHR risk at http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2013/02/peering-underneath-icebergs-water-level.html. In a volunteer study (i.e., only a fraction of true incidents reported) of 36 ECRI PSO hospitals, 171 EHR-related "events" serious enough to cause harm were voluntarily reported in just 9 weeks. 8 of the "health IT events" were reported to have resulted in patient harm, and 3 were possibly related to patient deaths.
From a press release from nurses at Affinity Medical Center (Ohio) on the nature of the problems:
... The programs are often counterintuitive, cumbersome to use, and sometimes simply malfunction. Nurses are finding that the technology is taking time away from patients and fundamentally changing the nature of nursing.” ... I’m concerned that the manner in which this technology is being implemented may pose serious disruptions in patient care.”
 |
| An open letter from nurses at an Ohio hospital, Affinity, on EHR "threats to patient safety." Click to enlarge. |
The EPIC EHR apparently had just recently "gone live" at Children's Hospital Oakland.
From "Children's Oakland completes Phase 1 of $89 million electronic records system", Nov 20, 2013 (http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2013/11/childrens-oakland-89m-emr.html):
Children's Hospital & Research Center Oakland has completed the first phase of an $89 million Epic Systems Corp. electronic health records system that links inpatient operations and an oncology/hematology clinic.
Other outpatient clinics are expected to come online in March or April, spokeswoman Melinda Krigel told the Business Times.
... The project's overall cost, $89 million, includes hardware, software and other implementation costs, including a separate SoftLab system that interfaces with the main electronic medical records system, Krigel said.
The official "go-live" date was Nov. 5.
See also the Children's Hospital Oakland Annual Report at http://www.chofoundation.org/
... The Epic system will launch in November 2013 at Children’s inpatient facilities as well as in the Operating Room, the Emergency Department, the Day Hospital, and the Oncology/ Hematology Clinic.
I believe the possibility of clinicians being so distracted by computer data entry duties, and/or communications being impaired by the system's outputs, that this patient was left anoxic for a crucial period of time needs to be investigated.
In my view, in the differential diagnosis of clinical chaos in 2014, the chaos caused by healthcare IT needs to be a consideration.
My concerns may be shown unfounded in this case (I hope they are), and the injuries the result of other factors. In consideration of the reported complaints from other organizations, however, not conducting an impartial investigating of a role of the new EHR in this tragedy would be, in my opinion, cavalier.
-- SS
Jan. 5, 2014 Addendum:
From a court document cached here: http://www.cci.drexel.edu/faculty/ssilverstein/1230rrr.pdf , the following is written at p. 11-12:
... Originally the surgery was uneventful and MCMATH awoke from sedation in the recovery room speaking with hermother, Petitioner LATASHA WINKFIELD asking for a popsicle. MCMATH was taken to the ICU and her mother was told to wait several minutes while they fixed her IV.
After being told several times that it would be just another 10 minutes, approximately 25-45 minutes after MCMATH was brought into the ICU, WINKFIELD went back and found her daughter sitting up in bed bleeding from her mouth. It was evident that this had been transpiring for some time. The nursing staff said “it was normal” and the mother stayed at the bedside as the bleeding grew increasingly worse. The nurses gave WINKFIELD a cup/catch basin for MCMATH to bleed from her mouth into. WINKFIELD asked for assistance and was told that this was normal and was given paper towels to clean the blood off herself and MCMATH.
The bleeding intensified to where copious amounts of blood were being expelled from MCMATH’s mouth and then nose. MCMATH’s stepfather was also present and assisted in the attemps to stem/collect the blood.
Again, WINKFIELD asked for assistance, and a doctor, and was only given a bigger container to collect the blood and, later, a suction device to suction the increasing volume of blood. The stepfather continued to suction while the mother went and got her mother, a nurse, to take over for her. The grandmother saw what was happening and made multiple requests, and then a loud demand, for a doctor.
MCMATH shortly thereafter suffered a heart attack and fell into a comatose state. She later was pronounced “brain dead”…
"Heart attack" (i.e., primary myocardial infarction) in a 13-year-old sounds far less likely than exsanguination to the point of hypovolemic shock, severe hypotension, and cardiac arrest. That such events transpired in an ICU, with family present and calling for help, suggests there were major clinician distractions of some sort at play.
A reader wrote me wondering if a new CPOE component could have caused delays in evaluation and treatment. When someone is dying, you simply cannot waste time 'clicking away', they wrote.
A reader also wrote me wondering if an EHR crash occurred at the time this patient was left with family to exsanguinate, causing clinical chaos.
That is a particularly interesting thought. See the multiple posts at http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search?q=ehr+crash.
In my opinion, these issues require investigation.
-- SS
